January 7, 2006
-
The Man in the Suit ... and the Man in the Mirror
So I stole some time for a belated first look at "The Revenge of the
Sith" last night. And what is my one-word impression of this much-heralded,
thirty-years-in-the-waiting, massively high-tech, high-cost final
knitting-up of the saga?I really do hate to say this, but: DREADFUL.
Huge wars
without context, vast exotic landscapes breathlessly passed by, odd
creatures inappropriately used (Obi and his shrieking blue-ruffed
lizard; yikes), endless high-tech battles interspersed only
occasionally by
inexplicable twists of tale and missed opportunity. Amidala sits
muttering sadly into her clasped hands, as Palpatine takes over the
Senate: "This is how liberty dies: to thunderous applause."
Hello? Leap up and give an impassioned speech, Senator!
We've seen you do it before ....... oh, sorry, I forgot. You're
pregnant. Probably that's what's rendered you completely hapless
(and speaking of pregnant: with all this uber-technology and
super-mental capacity surrounding you, no one got an inkling that the
perfectly healthy full-term birthing that came 'prematurely' out of
your tiny belly were actually twins? Sigh. Never mind). "Oh,
and Obi," calls Yoda near the end (stammering in his haste to get
his say in before reaching that 30-second limit on actual plot
development), "You know while you're hanging out on Tatooine guarding
the baby? Well, I've figured out how to channel dead Jedis, so
you can get some training in with your old master while you're waiting." What, what,
what?? Oh, never mind, never mind.I hadn't, until this viewing experience, completely bought into the
premise that even a good actor can't salvage a bad script, but after
watching the well-credentialed Ewan McGregor stumble unappealing and
unconvincingly around in his great unsplintering coffin of wooden
dialogue nailed with unbreakably unfunny humor -- I'm there. It
can't be done. And had I not also taken a look at the "Making Of"
disk, I would have left Hayden in my personal dustbin labeled "Bad
Actors Who Unfortunately Also Grew Up Not To Be Particularly
Cute," much like his predecessor in the hero/anti-hero role, Mark
Hamill, but then I found myself unexpectedly riveted by the mini-documentary "The Chosen
One." Not only does Hayden suddenly come pleasingly alive, when
asked to chat extemporaneously on the philosophical underpinnings of
his character (maybe there's hope for him after all, paired with an actual
scriptwriter), but hearing Lucas and his team talk about what they meant to
do, and why, definitely brings a much deeper degree of appreciation,
even if what they finally achieved in no way measures up."The day I first came out in the Vader suit," says Hayden, "There
was -- awe -- on the set. It was amazing, being inside
that suit. There was a real sense of..." he pauses,
word-searching, face lit up, "...empowerment."
He smiles, relaxed, pleased. "I won't forget that for a long
time." One feels, watching this decent young man speak so raptly of
the power of the vestments of the Dark, an echo of the gut-wrenching
emotion (the only real emotion this viewer extracted from the whole
movie) when Anakin goes in to kill the Jedi
children, and then again when he strangles Padme from afar; feelings that mirrored my long-ago, horrified adolescent
double-take, in the darkened theater, when Luke learned that Vader is his
father."No, no, no!" cries the well-trained modern psyche raised on a rich multicultural panoply
of morality myths and fairytales. Good men can't do evil
things! Absolute evil
can't father good. There is Light, and there is Dark. There
is Good, and there is Bad. There is God, and there is Satan.
They are equal, and opposite, and noninterchangeable.But of course, as Hayden charmingly and Lucas lengthily explains, the
key to this entire tale is not only the redemption, but why redemption
was necessary at all. Good men do commit unspeakable acts.
And evildoers can't admit to themselves that what they do is evil,
because
there is indeed purpose to their madness; a purpose that the rest of us
not only understand -- but have, in our own personal moments of evil,
absolutely
and utterly shared.If young viewers manage to wrest these ideas from the morass of improbable androids, space
battle, inexplicable politics, heavy-busted aliens, and unconvincing dialogue -- then it all will
have been worthwhile, after all.

Comments (12)
When Star Wars hit the screen, I felt that it was a rite of passage, validating science fiction as a literary form. Perhaps this movie marks another rite of passage for the genre. Or maybe it really is the writing.
Hollywood may have writers, but I don't know where the hell they are. I go and look at episodes of Twillight Zone and then compare that to today's reality TV and sitcoms, and today's mostly-fluff movies, and it's clear that something's missing. It's the writing.
i was pretty well satisfied with part III, possibly in part because i sort of had to be, since that was all we were going to get, you know? accept it and move on, or wallow in its shortcomings forever. because i love the star wars movies so much that it would be forever. and historically, i've been able to just close my eyes to intense lack of acting ability (see: christiansen. see: portman. see: digital yoda (all the proof one might ever need that what you can do with a puppet and some ingenuity far outclasses what you can do on a computer - if you wanna witness true excitement about making movies, definitely find the Making Of star wars to jedi. see even, though i've heard otherwise: mcgregor.) and just work on processing the storyline.
unfortunately, they ignored the storyline for the better part of the first two films, so they had a crapton of stuff to explain in the third, and even at the three hours or whatever that it lasted, there just was not enough time to cover it all.
and although you'll probably never hear anyone outside my demographic say it, and knowing that it probably makes me sound like a giant freaknerd to admit it (though i don't actually believe it makes me one,) i have to say that a lot of what i take with me in terms of univeral spirituality comes from those original three movies, back when all lucas had was his story. because it's totally true: if you can't find yourself in every character in those movies, then you're lying to someone, probably yourself.
LOL ... you really DIDN'T like it!
I love Scar Wars!
I've learned not to expect too much from sequels/prequels therefore I'm never disappointed when they don't measure up to the original. However, I too was greatly disappointed when Amidala just sat there helplessly pregnant and crying when her world was crumbling around her. She was an ass-kicker and name-taker before. What happened?
There are no good writers in Hollywood because no one wants to invest in new blood. The producers write their own scripts (they are trained to make movies not write them), or they hire someone's cousin's sister's child who wouldn't know a plot-line from a clothes-line (plus the fact that they've never seen anything other than Hanna Barbarra), OR (God help us!) they get some ex-washed-up-has-been-rock star to do it! They also have come to believe that you don't need a script if you have special effects!!! There. I've vented. Thank you for your time.
Yes, yes, yes.
(Resounding, no less.)
Old hands on the Skywalker Ranch have assured me the amount of dialogue improvised by Ford and Fisher in the earlier films was vast. Does this mean Lucas on his own can't write dialogue to save his life? Or does he simply, like us all, have his off days? As for whether those larger concepts of good and evil and what portions of them exist within us all (yeah, yeah, some more than others...) actually reach the audience through the morass of special effects and logically challenged scenes...
...a distinct possibility that impossible it is...
Yes. I totally agree. Sometimes the wrapper, the sugary coating, the bonus stuff... sometimes there's really a good center in there, and hopefully people will remember that part of the treat, not the rest, but maybe the rest makes the center that much better. Good men do bad things. Nobody ever really says "Bad men do good things," much.
It's the reason I have become such a fan of the HBO series "Deadwood." In the first episodes of the first season, everybody seems bad. Men, women, children, all. What there might've been with the "good" has fallen away in times too hard to allow anything but bad. But as the show unfolds, as the characters develop under the wonderful creations of David Milch, it shows that bad men really are capable of good. So what is it? Bad men doing good, or good men gone awry, or that it's unfair to call a man wearing swirling black capes one or the other, except for what he is...a man. I think when they made Vader mostly machine, that's where they tried to take that aspect of it away--yes, men can be bad but still do good, but a machine? No. Yet under all that, there is a man, still. So the possibility of good...it exists.
I'm told Hayden Christensen was pretty amazing in Life as a House, the movie he did right before he got picked for Star Wars. Hopefully his next projects will give him better material to work with.
I have a coworker who says Revenge of the Sith would have been a great movie if Lucas had just sketched out his ideas, and given them to a real writer and a real director!
Funny, I just watched it the other day too. I didn't think much of it. In fact, I kept falling asleep. I thought it was better than the past 2, but none match the very first one. None had the endearing characters of the original Starwars.
I liked the part when Yoda walks through the door and, with a subtle hand gesture, slams the two big red guys against the wall. The rest pales against this moment.
(I enjoyed reading your comments. I found myself saying, "yeh, yeh, what she said!")
glad to see you around and writing............i've never been a Star Wars fan so I don't have a valuable comment about it.......
I gave up on sequels long ago.
I've only seen one sequel in the past 5? years that was as good as or better than the original.
That was Toy Story II.
I laughed at the first one.
I laughed so hard I cried at the second one (the whole way through).
Comments are closed.